Skip to Content

Changes for page 378

Last modified by Ludovic Dubost on 2019/06/17 20:28
From version 2.1
edited by Ludovic Dubost
on 2019/06/17 20:28
Change comment: Migrated property [image] from class [Blog.BlogPostClass]
To version 1.1
edited by Ludovic Dubost
on 2005/11/29 16:00
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -#includeForm("Blog.BlogPostSheet")
1 +#includeForm("XWiki.ArticleClassSheet")
Blog.BlogPostClass[0]
Is hidden
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -No
Publish date
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2005-05-29 14:42:00.0
Is published
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Yes
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -France says "No" to the European Constitution Treaty, but not to Europe
Content
... ... @@ -1,18 +1,0 @@
1 -
2 -
3 -<p>Today, France said "No" (around 54/55% with more than 75% participation) to the European Constitution Treaty, but it is important to say that it's not an anti-Europe "No"..</p>
4 -
5 -<p>I personnally voted "Yes", because I believed it was better to fix the problems this text had based on the good things that were in them. Now, althout I voted "Yes", I found many problems to this text.. The first one being that it wasn't a "constitution" having way too many details that shouldn't be in the foundations of Europe.</p>
6 -
7 -<p>There was a lot of debate in the last weeks from the citizens, but not from the major parties. The major parties (which represent about 75% of the votes) have tried to hide the issues by "almost" refusing the debate about the text itself, supporting the "Yes" and leaving the "No" to the extremes.</p>
8 -
9 -<p>I wish this "No" will be understood as being "pro" European, that all Europe will understand that France wants MORE Europe. Not only a Europe that brings a European Economic Community but also one that takes into account the political, social and environmental aspects: a real Political Europe.</p>
10 -
11 -<p>This "No" is an opportunity to really discuss at the European level and fix this treaty and move forward at a faster pace.<br />
12 -</p>
13 -
14 -<a name="a000378more"></a>
15 -<a id="more"></a>
16 -
17 -
18 -
XWiki.ArticleClass[0]
Content
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,18 @@
1 +
2 +
3 +<p>Today, France said "No" (around 54/55% with more than 75% participation) to the European Constitution Treaty, but it is important to say that it's not an anti-Europe "No"..</p>
4 +
5 +<p>I personnally voted "Yes", because I believed it was better to fix the problems this text had based on the good things that were in them. Now, althout I voted "Yes", I found many problems to this text.. The first one being that it wasn't a "constitution" having way too many details that shouldn't be in the foundations of Europe.</p>
6 +
7 +<p>There was a lot of debate in the last weeks from the citizens, but not from the major parties. The major parties (which represent about 75% of the votes) have tried to hide the issues by "almost" refusing the debate about the text itself, supporting the "Yes" and leaving the "No" to the extremes.</p>
8 +
9 +<p>I wish this "No" will be understood as being "pro" European, that all Europe will understand that France wants MORE Europe. Not only a Europe that brings a European Economic Community but also one that takes into account the political, social and environmental aspects: a real Political Europe.</p>
10 +
11 +<p>This "No" is an opportunity to really discuss at the European level and fix this treaty and move forward at a faster pace.<br />
12 +</p>
13 +
14 +<a name="a000378more"></a>
15 +<a id="more"></a>
16 +
17 +
18 +
Title
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +France says "No" to the European Constitution Treaty, but not to Europe