Skip to Content

Changes for page 491

Last modified by Ludovic Dubost on 2019/06/17 20:28
From version 1.1
edited by Ludovic Dubost
on 2005/11/29 16:05
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 2.1
edited by Ludovic Dubost
on 2019/06/17 20:28
Change comment: Migrated property [image] from class [Blog.BlogPostClass]

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -#includeForm("XWiki.ArticleClassSheet")
1 +#includeForm("Blog.BlogPostSheet")
XWiki.ArticleClass[0]
Content
... ... @@ -1,21 +1,0 @@
1 -
2 -
3 -<p>Shai Agassi, SAP's President of Product and Technology is either misinformed or not very coherent..</p>
4 -
5 -<p>A few weeks ago, he invests in <a href="http://www.socialtext.com/weblog/050927sapinvest.html">SocialText</a> which then <a href="http://www.socialtext.com/weblog/051010web2con2.html">announces it's return to open source roots</a>.</p>
6 -
7 -<p>And now, <a href="http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2145809/sap-dismisses-open-source">Shai Agassi dismisses open source as non innovative and as 'socialist'</a>:</p>
8 -
9 -<p>"Intellectual property [IP] socialism is the worst that can happen to any IP-based society," he said. "And we are an IP-based society. If there is no way to protect IP, there is no reason to invest in IP."</p>
10 -
11 -<p>Well, it looks like it's so socialist that your own company invests in companies which have open source at their core. Or maybe "investment" is a socialist word.</p>
12 -
13 -<p>Marc Fleury from JBoss <a href=http://jboss.org/jbossBlog/blog/mfleury/?permalink=Is_Open_Source_capitalism_socialism_or_communism.txt">has a good answer</a> for those wishing to understand why Open Source is able of sustaining reasearch & development and innovation.</p>
14 -
15 -<p>via <a href="http://standblog.org/blog/2005/11/22/93114509-en-vrac-en-direct-de-londres">Tristan</a></p>
16 -
17 -<a name="a000491more"></a>
18 -<a id="more"></a>
19 -
20 -
21 -
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -SAP investisting in something it doesn't believe in ?
Blog.BlogPostClass[0]
Is hidden
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +No
Publish date
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2005-11-23 13:07:00.0
Is published
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Yes
Title
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +SAP investisting in something it doesn't believe in ?
Content
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,21 @@
1 +
2 +
3 +<p>Shai Agassi, SAP's President of Product and Technology is either misinformed or not very coherent..</p>
4 +
5 +<p>A few weeks ago, he invests in <a href="http://www.socialtext.com/weblog/050927sapinvest.html">SocialText</a> which then <a href="http://www.socialtext.com/weblog/051010web2con2.html">announces it's return to open source roots</a>.</p>
6 +
7 +<p>And now, <a href="http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2145809/sap-dismisses-open-source">Shai Agassi dismisses open source as non innovative and as 'socialist'</a>:</p>
8 +
9 +<p>"Intellectual property [IP] socialism is the worst that can happen to any IP-based society," he said. "And we are an IP-based society. If there is no way to protect IP, there is no reason to invest in IP."</p>
10 +
11 +<p>Well, it looks like it's so socialist that your own company invests in companies which have open source at their core. Or maybe "investment" is a socialist word.</p>
12 +
13 +<p>Marc Fleury from JBoss <a href=http://jboss.org/jbossBlog/blog/mfleury/?permalink=Is_Open_Source_capitalism_socialism_or_communism.txt">has a good answer</a> for those wishing to understand why Open Source is able of sustaining reasearch & development and innovation.</p>
14 +
15 +<p>via <a href="http://standblog.org/blog/2005/11/22/93114509-en-vrac-en-direct-de-londres">Tristan</a></p>
16 +
17 +<a name="a000491more"></a>
18 +<a id="more"></a>
19 +
20 +
21 +